November 9, 2010
Has main stream media in America covered the peer reviewed scientific report about 911?
By Planet Wealth
That there were active (re-iterate, ACTIVE) thermitic materials in the dust from the world trade centres from day one.
We have learned distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center
The red part of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
If main stream media in America have not covered this, then why not.
Reports!. What reporters. They did not report their findings did they. Point me to it because that is the question at hand. I want to know.
How could reporters diagnose a peer reviewed report. Have they done that in the past. How did they honest in their findings against the peer reviewed report.
Topics: Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
One Response to “Has main stream media in America covered the peer reviewed scientific report about 911?”
Comments
« What is the secret to successful forex trading? | Home | Some Great Guidelines On Trading Techniques »
November 9th, 2010 at 7:56 am
Because reporters looked into the so called "peer reviewed" journal and learned it was nothing of the kind. The company that started publishing these "journals" less than a year ago publishes hundreds of them on-line where for a price anyone can get their so-called scientific paper "published."
No one but the authors of this "paper" have been able to find these chips either. Chips no one else can find, fake scientific paper … there’s nothing for the media to cover.