December 19, 2010
Why dint world trade center building #5 Collapse?
By Planet Wealth
WTC 5 was later demolished as part of the clean-up of Ground Zero
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnGt7Bd5sNo
Serious fires raged through WTC 5 for hours. Despite the massive structural hurt shown by the holes, and fires far more severe than those in WTC 1, 2, and 7, WTC 5 did not collapse. WTC #1 and #2 were hit by planes but what about WTC #7
HOW DID WORLD TRADE CENTER 7 FALL?
I know someone is going to give me the well loved mechanics link and claim that fuel stored in the basement fed the fire and over the course of the day the steel was weaken and than it collapsed.
But I am looking for a real explanation rather than a fictional BS tale.
Lets not forget that NIST admitted that without the energy from the plane removing the fire proofing on the twin towers they would not have collapsed. The FEMA report stated that all of the energy was dispersed upon impact. Then we look at WTC #7, witch no plane hit. So dose this mean that ruble from the twin towers dislodged the fire proofing?
Fascinating that all three buildings fell without resistance.
Topics: Uncategorized | 3 Comments »
3 Responses to “Why dint world trade center building #5 Collapse?”
Comments
« Name of automatic forex trading software which is free? | Home | Is a Forex Demo Account Exactly the same as a Live Forex Account? »
December 19th, 2010 at 7:57 pm
well you see, 5 was structurally magic, plus, it was smarter than 7, 1 or 2. everyone could tell by looking at them, they were stupid buildings. 7 was so dumb, im surprised it didnt fall on a really sunny day. no but seriuosly, fantastic question, the answer is that 5 didnt have any explosives in it.
December 19th, 2010 at 7:57 pm
(1) Why didn’t, not ‘why dint’ – it affects your credibility.
(2) Skeptic Magazine is skeptical of the WTC skeptics, since it smells like another juicy conspiracy ‘theory’ and probably is. Go to their website if you really want to learn about it (and they’re nothing like Well loved Mechanics; they really have excellent arguments and data).
December 19th, 2010 at 7:57 pm
If you’re committed to believing that it was an inside job, any other explanation will be dismissed as "a fictional BS tale".